
After the first police attack. The demonstration truck complete with a set of turn-tables is abandoned. It appears they even arrested the DJ.
Photo from Ungdomshuset online gallery. Also, check out the images at Ekstra Bladet and Politiken.
While some punks were still defending their demonstrations with paint bombs and sticks.
Copenhagen saw riots yesterday (AP: Up to 300 Protesters Detained in Denmark). I was there. Lots of bits and pieces of information is rumbling around inside my head right now, so I might as well spill it out and set them straight.
My 16th of December
I was at a concert the night before. Long irrelevant story, but I couldn't find my bike but met an old friend and ended up walking along Nørrebrogade with her. She's going to take a turn east so we're standing on a corner sharing the last few personal events from our lives since ages ago when last time we met. Suddenly people start running towards us from Runddelen. Lots of people. We take refuge right around the corner. We talk a bit and then she leaves. I walk back to see what's happening.
There is people everywhere. At this point I would have to make a wild guess at 1500-2000. But nine out of ten is just standing, staring. About 20 armored police cars are driving towards Ungdomshuset from all streets around it. Behind each is a phalanx of combat dressed cops. In front of Ungdomshuset is still a large group of protesters, some lighting fires in the street, some throwing stones at the police.
Other cops are making bystanders, calm sympathisers of the demonstration, witnesses walk away from the scene. I had to walk back a few hundred metres too, so I didn't get a close look at the police attack, but I'm sure it was a brutal victory. In the short run. Because most protesters had obviously escaped in all directions. The following minutes saw a couple of brief cobble stone attacks and a few fires in the streets. Someone must have read the manual on guerrilla warfare because it appeared basically a handful of people were entertaining the police for hours.
After about two hours I guess, the mass of demonstrators, curious people and sympathisers where largely confined to the area right in front of Ungdomshuset. The fires in the streets elsewhere were being extinguished by a fireman crew. So the police pulled back and stayed observant. Good idea, because yesterday was a clear demonstration of how counter productive any police raid can really be. Each time they make a full warfare like strike, it attracts more audience. And each time they baton and hand-cuff some 15 years old punk kid, it creates more sympathisers among the previously neutral witnesses.
I met many old friends in the crowd. People from high school I have hardly seen in a decade. Two of these had seen the initial police attack on the actual demonstration. Because it was actually a peaceful demonstration to begin with. It was supposed to start in Ungdomshuset and end in Christiania - the two last symbols of the threatened underground culture in Denmark. But as far as I have been told it was attacked either because some of the demonstrators were masked and/or because no-one wanted to give in their name to the police and register as a responsible arranging the demonstration.
Whatever the reason, the demonstration was massacred by the police not more than perhaps a hundred metres from Ungdomshuset. My two friends had been watching that. The funniest thing they told was about the police teargassing themselves. The street is not too wide so it must have been quite chaotic at the front line as some n00b cop fires a tear gas grenade right into the battle field without any other cops wearing gas masks. About twenty cops had had to make an escape and run for it. They came back to cry and vomit at the spot my friends were using to peek at the action from. (Danish tear gas is the strongest in the world. Only Israel uses the same stuff.)
Anyway, we hang out for a couple of hours having a few beers. The kids in Ungdomshuset set up a pair of speakers and blast out tracks like We're not gonna take it and Fight for your right. A punk party was planned for the night, but I don't know if they pulled through with it. I get a message on the phone saying my bike is parked outside a friend's house. Cursing about it I leave in the direction of the city with my two buddies.
About halfway there some policemen stop me. Detained, §6, body search. Why? Because they had spotted a Ungdomshuset banner sticking out of my pocket. I had just picked it up from the battlefield debris as a kind of souvenir. So, basically you risk arrest wearing Ungdomshuset paraphernalia. Some paragraphs have goone loose.
We stop by a friend of a friend's house to watch the news. Headline: ALL SYMPATHY GONE. What? What we had just experienced was a lot of sympathy from all kinds of people in the streets. Direct transmission from reporter in the street right outside Ungdomshuset: "They are hiding out inside. Who knows if they will get violent later when they have had more alcohol. My information is uncertain." (Not a precise translation! Vaguely rephrased from memory.) Your information? What information? That reporter was basically making up some crazy story. They call themselves TV2 NEWS - perhaps they should change that to TV2 LIES?
The background info for you and my opinion
The TV station pulling off a strongly politically biassed report is unfortunately not too surprising. The cases of Ungdomshuset and Christiania have become part of a messy right wing attack on anything alternative, non-conformity element of Danish culture. TV2 happily partakes in portraying efficient police work which is exciting violence of the socially acceptable type. Even when what really happened most of the time was just a bunch of punk kids doing mostly harmless fires and grafitti getting chased around by an army of cops.
To add insult to injury, Copenhagen sold the house at a price way below market value to a far right fundamentalist christian sect. It couldn't get worse than that. They use whatever attention their sorry brainwashing club can get to proclaim they are cleaning out the city of demons. Following that sympathisers have chipped in to buy the house back from the sect at a price some US$ 1.5 million above what they got if from the city for. They have declined selling it. Mind boggling. How can a cult turn down such an offer?
And actually, all sympathy is not gone. Far from it. But only one political party is left in open support: My Enhedslisten :) Morten Kabell told Politiken (my translation):
The kids are frustrated about loosing the house. I understand that but I personally wouldn't have acted by rioting. I don't support rioting but by principle I support Ungdomshuset. If the police hadn't attacked it wouldn't have gone so far. Also, it is deeply problematic that the police has arrested a journalist from TV2. That raises suspicion they have something to hide.
The leading cop, Flemming Steen Munck, a hardliner compared to his predecessor, is saying something weird to Ekstra Bladet (my translation):
They were only allowed to leave the house so we could confine them.
Is it just me or is that contradictory with the demonstration being attacked because it later violated something?
I don't have time to write any more. But I got most of it down here. Feel free to ask. Also check out the Ungdomshuset website in English.
Great report, Benno! Citizen's journalism in action.
Thanks, so glad to hear what no one reports; attacking protesters is part of defending the illusion of free.
Thank you Benno. I've been searching thrue the swedish newspapers about this but I haven't found any meaningful information. So thank you for telling us your story!
Benno - it seems there are 2 fundamental issues (a) how you effect the domestic laws of the land i.e. (i) ask the squatters to leave nicely (the nice way of civilized people) or (ii) to use egregious violence against the squatters and their sympathizers (the authoritarian, proto-Nazi way) and (b) legality of such occupation in Denmark (evidently decided by the Court of democratic Denmark).
However, it must be observed that while Denmark is a "nice" democratic country, BUT in an international context through its linkage to UK-US state terrorism and US-Israeli State Terrorism (USIST) in the Middle East, Demark is clearly a proto-Nazi, war criminal, anti-Arab anti-Semitic, Islamophobic, racist rogue state in its support for US Occupation of Iraq (international squatting) that has been associated with 0.9 million post-invasion excess deaths (war criminal mass murder by the US-led Coalition to which Denmark belongs) , 2 million Iraqi refugees in neighbouring countries (Genocide according to the UN Genocide Convention) and a UN estimate that currently 100,000 Iraqis are fleeing their country each month (continuing Denmark-backed US-UK-Australian-effected genocide).
Quite appropriate therefore that Denmark's new Princess comes from a place (Tasmania, Australia ) that on the theory of "terra nullius" (empty land, no occupation of the land) completely exterminated its Indigenous Inhabitants between 1803-1876 (the last completely Indigenous Tasnmanian, a woman Truganini, died in 1876 - her bones were on public display for years in Princess Mary's hometown Hobart). There are actually still thousands of Part-European Tasmanian Aboriginals (descended from married or raped Aboriginal women) and the Tasmanian Government has taken various steps to say sorry and even to compensate these descendants.
However the racist, genocidal, war criminal, Bush-ite Australian Government (and the Opposition) (who both support US state terrorism in Afghanistan - 2.1 million post-invasion deaths) are complicit in a continuing Aboriginal Genocide that commenced in 1788 (the Aboriginal population dropped from 1 million to 0.1 million in the first century), continued in the 20th century (with forced removal of 0.1 million Aboriginal children from their mothers and appalling living conditions); and is continuing in the 21st century: the "annual death rate" is 2.2% (for Indigenous i.e. Aboriginal Australians), 2.4% for Aborigines in the Northern Territory as compared to 0.4% (what it should be for Aborigines), 0.7% for White Australians and 2.5% for sheep in pre-drought Australian sheep farm paddocks; it has been estimated by a top diabetologist Professor Paul Zimmet that appalling health conditions mean that Australian Aborigines may die out by the end of the century (passive genocide by Racist White Australia, racist White Denmark's ally in Middle East war crimes, genocide and forced eviction of 2 million Iraqi refugees) (see: Sydney Madonna & Aboriginal Genocide.
Benno, it's with great pain that I read the news of the police raid and brutality on the people of Ungdomshuset. I can remember living in Copenhagen and hearing of the possibility of conflict with police some 4 years ago. It is truly a shame that resistance is contorted to terrorism and expression of self and freedom is misconstrued to be something which is actually against the rights which we seek to preserve. I wish things could change immediately, but I know that without such demonstrations we will not find change and without local activism we will only find constriction and intrusion into our ways of living. So, thank you for publishing this on the web. I know that the mainstream media here (US) did not go any farther than to report that there were riots on the streets of Copenhagen. Keep it up, my friend.
Great job, Benno.
Btw I found this because of our mutual friend The Sentinel...
What made the Sentinel go ape@!$%# was my article:
At midnightfire "dot" blogspot "dot" com
You were not referred to this article because of me, conversely the author of this article found me through you. Presumably because you'd not have any real idea about the nonsense you were spouting but you thought this guy would do a 'good job.' And he didn't.
Facts are facts and the truth is in the facts.
I am not sure why you are guiding people to your blog either, unless it is because you suspect that only people that affirm your 'beliefs' will visit, because otherwise they are really wasting their time.
If anyone dares to post a comment you do not like you not only delete the ones you cannot contend, but very bizarrely, cut and paste the reminder and re-post them as anonymous.
Very underhanded, very strange, very fascist.
You clearly do not believe in free speech and that is why you act as the great censor.
In short you are a hypocrite.
You googled it and then, by way of a Christmas miracle, Amos Keppler just stumbles upon this story. Of course. That's your story and your sticking to it.
Under your own (stolen) 10 defining features of fascism you qualify under at least four:
1) Disagreement is treason (You sought out dissenters to your version of events)
2)Obsessions with conspiracy theories (It wasn't the court order that sparked the riots, but right wing christians, Government intolerance, closet Nazis in power etc etc)
3)Speaking to people's emotions (patos) encouraging mass hysteria (Call anyone who diagrees a Nazi, once they are put into that neat little box anything they say can be disregarded)
4)Anything can be used to argument in favour of war (Spin any angle about the rights of squatters in order that they and their ilk can wage war against society)
I notice that you are unable to comment on the article I published in response to your comments, so you feel the need to vent abuse instead.
Rent paying not an issue? It was central to the whole thing.
As for me being a Nazi, how puerile, how childish. By your own admission you have only read one article in my blog and at no point is race mentioned let alone the Nordic supremacist version of the Nazis that was so readily embraced by your countrymen during the war, with thousands joining the SS. Your country did not even put up a fight to stop the Nazis.
Whereas mine, grandparents included, fought tooth and nail and very nearly lost everything to prevent Nazi rule in Europe, including Denmark. We have only just finished paying off the war debt this week.
If I were you I would keep very quiet about Nazi's.
But I notice that you a Dane of the ginger variety, which means that your ancestors are not Vikings but Viking 'booty' from the north sea coast and that explains a lot of your scorn for your fellow countrymen.
OK, I am already drunk and you are ridiculous. But before I slip into unconsciousness I would just like to say a few things:
a) You left factually inaccurate comments on my blog because you disagreed with the content. That's fine, I defend freedom of speech. I say you found it by referral, you say you sought it out. Either ways, you did not deconstruct the central thesis; instead you left bold statements with no foundation.
b) You have decided to label me a Nazi, again with no foundation, merely because I do not agree with your analysis of the events that took place.
c) You concede that Gideon Polya's comments above "seem like a crazy rant of a conspiracy theory madman" (because it is) but then agree with the comments anyway, presumably because they fit your pre-packed version of events.
d) The Danish army would have better served the Danish people by resisting the Nazi's by way of conventional arms, as was their duty, instead of waiting till they had been subjugated by that power. In any event, thousands of them donned the uniform of the SS and many more joined the ranks of civil administration and aided the Nazi occupation. The resistance uprising, in common with the French marquis 'uprising' did occur, strangely, only weeks before the liberation by the British.
e) The træl thing I picked up from Danish relatives and friends (admittedly it is more of an Icelandic preoccupation though) and was mentioned because invariably wherever I find people who express that they are anti-nationalists I find people who have reason to fear nationalism.
d) I did not place any label upon you, I merely stated that in your own regurgitated definition of fascism you fall in under four of them.
OK, anymore for anymore...
I am glad you cannot be bothered anymore, because you have nothing real to say anyway.
The comments are pathetic because you do not agree with them, no more no less.
If you had read my refutation of your assertions properly (after your hit and run comment on my blog) you would have seen that most of it was taken at source from Ungdomshuset. It contained all the facts you needed. What did you want, a scholarly discourse on the history and merits of squatting?
The core of your argument was "The not-paying-rent part is false. Simple as that" and when I proved to you they were squatters of their own admission you said "Come on, they are not that kind of squatters" And you have the front to accuse me of twisting facts!?
If you read the other articles in my blog before labelling me a Nazi or accusing me of lacking substance you would have seen that all of them are reasoned and referenced.
As for the 'arena of death', bring it one my ginger friend.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |